Thomas Bliss in Hartford
|From James Savage's book, A
Genealogical Dictionary of The First Settlers of New England, Before
1692 Volume #1, Pgs 198 - 209:
THOMAS, Hartford, was an early, but not
orig. sett. of whose com. from Eng. nothing is kn. but his first resid.
was in that pt. [[vol. 1, p. 202]] of Boston call. the mount, afterwards
Braintree, now Quincy. In 1639 or 40 he is first ment. in Conn. at the
same time with Thomas, jr. wh. may be the freem. of 18 May 1642 in Mass.,
there left by his f. whose d. is early heard of, tho. exact date is not
gain. His wid. Margaret was very resolute and capable, and after two or
three yrs. rem. with all her ch. exc. Thomas, and Ann, to Springfield,
there d. 28 Aug. 1684. She had nine ch. and it has been absurd. said, that
all were brot. from Eng. Of most, this is true. Ann, wh. m. 29 Apr. 1642,
Robert Chapman of Saybrook; Mary m. 26 Nov. 1646, Joseph Parsons; Thomas;
Nathaniel; Lawrence; and perhaps Samuel; were b. in Eng. but our side of
the water may claim, prob. Sarah, m. 20 July 1659, John Scott; Elizabeth
m. 15 Feb. 1670, as his sec. w. Miles Morgan; possib. Hannah, wh. d. 25
Jan. 1662, unm. and certain. John. THOMAS, Weymouth, was possib. the freem.
of 18 May 1642, but next yr. certain. rem. to Rehoboth, there d. June
1649. His will, by careless statem. in Geneal. Reg. IV. 282, said to bear
date of 8th of that mo. but also on same day to be brot. into Ct. gives
valua. inform. a. his ch. Jonathan, to wh. he devis. his ho., his eldest
d. whose bapt. name is not told, w. of Thomas Williams; Mary, w. of
Nathaniel Harmon of Braintree; s.-in-law (perhaps mean. s. of his w.)
Nicholas Ide, and his s. Nathaniel. From find. no ment. of him after 1649
at R. I suppose, confus. of him with Thomas of Norwich was easy. THOMAS,
Norwich, 1660, s. of Thomas the first, had been of Hartford, and early
after d. of his f. rem. to Saybrook, a. the end of Oct. 1644, took u.
Elizabeth had Elizabeth b. 20 Nov. 1640; Sarah, 26 Aug. 1647; Mary, 7 Feb.
1649; Thomas, 3 Mar. 1652, wh. d. 29 Jan. 1682, prob. unm.; Deliverance,
Aug. 1655; Samuel, 9 Dec. 1657; all bef. rem. from S. and at N. had Ann,
Sept. 1660, the sec. Eng. ch. b. in that place; Rebecca, Mar. 1663; and he
d. 15 Apr. 1688. By will, made two days bef. (req. by the insuffer.
tyranny of Sir Edmund Andros to be brot. to Boston for proof and rec.,
support. his retainers by the fees of office), provis. for w. Elizabeth
six ds. and only s. Samuel, is seen. Of this name, in 1834, four had been
gr. at Harv. four at Dart. seventeen at Yale, beside six at other N. E.
coll. of wh. most disting,. are Rev. Daniel of Concord, b. at Springfield,
Jan. 1715, Y. C. 1732, d. 11 May 1764; his s. Daniel, b. 1740, H. C. 1760,
d. in the Prov. of New Brunswick 1806; Jonathan, H. C. 1763, Ch. Just. of
the Sup. Ct. of N. B. and George, Y. C. 1784, LL. D. wh. d. 8 May 1830,
First Puritan Settlers of
Connecticut, pages 116-117.
Bliss, Thomas, sen'r and jr. were among
the early settlers of Hartford, before 1639. It is more than
probable that in the constant emigration down the Connecticut river, from
the three old towns, that the Thomas Bliss who settled at Norwich in '60
was one of the above -- probably was Thomas, jr. who had then grown to
manhood. Thomas made free in '63.
|Seven Hundred Ancestors,
The Founders Monument erected by the
Ancient Burying Ground Association of Hartford in 1837 in memory of the
first settlers of Hartford contains the names of Thomas Bliss, Matthew
Marvin, Richard Lyman and Timothy Stanley.
|A DIGEST OF THE EARLY
CONNECTICUT PROBATE RECORDS. 1650 to 1663, Page
Name: Thomas Bliss Location:
Invt. œ86-12-08. Taken 14 February, 1650, by Nathaniel Ward, Joseph
Mygatt. Nuncupative Will. Testimony of John Pinchon & Hen: Smith gives
property to his wife. Mary Parsons, a daughter, of Springfield, doth
Testify to the same.
Court Record, Page 17--20 February, 1650-1: Adms. to the Relict, She to
keep the whole Estate in her Hands for her Use and the Education of the
Children during her life, then to be divided among the Children, viz: to
Lawrence, to John, to Samuel, to Hester, to Elizabeth, to Hannah, and to