MISSOURI FLAT CEMETERY

Correspondence
from

THOMAS D. CUMPSTON
Deputy County Counsel
Dated July 12, 1996

            This document was sent by deputy county counsel, Tom Cumpston, to an attorney retained by the heirs of the Solomon Fields family who had located the 1872 deed from Charles and Charlotte Foster to the "Trustees of the Missouri Flat Cemetery."  
         In 1989, a County Counsel Opinion had been issued relative to the ownership of the Missouri Flat Cemetery.  According to Mr. Cumpston, its "conclusion regarding ownership was that a court would probably hold Missouri Flat Cemetery to be a public cemetery." 
          While the heirs were asserting that the Missouri Flat Cemetery "trustees" were trustees of a Rural Cemetery Association, there was nothing to evidence the "trustees" had ever incorporated the association as was required by law.  Upon learning of the 1872 deed, Mr. Cumpston inquired as to the existence of proof that certain criteria established under the 1859 Act allowing providing for Rural Cemetery Associations, that clearly could not be found.  Mr. Cumpston wrote, "I recognize your clients will fact [sic=face] practical difficulties in providing sufficient evidence on the above issues.  Clearly it is their burden to do so..."
          The closing paragraph in Mr. Cumpston's letter is very telling and exhibits the county's attitude relative to public cemeteries.  He wrote:
          "We will be happy to re-evaluate the situation jointly with you and your clients based upon the legal authorities you have provided, whatever evidence your clients can proffer, and all other applicable law.  Perhaps we will conclude together that litigation, such as a cooperative quiet title action, is the best means of resolving ownership issues.  There seems, however, little benefit to embarking upon that pat as a first resort."
          This attitude that our county's historic public cemeteries are readily available for transfer to whoever asks for them, illustrates the county's intention to never follow the law if it does not have to.       
          This correspondence is three pages in length and are presented here together.

BACK






BACK