Andersonville Newspaper Account

From: "William A. Mills" 
Andersonville researchers:

In 1992, while doing genealogical research via microfilm of old 1874
local newspapers, I came across an extensive newspaper article written by
L. M. Park, a 15 year old guard who was stationed at Andersonville almost
from the first establishment of the prison.  The end of this article says


William A. Mills
Perry, GA

It is the duty of every lover of justice, when he sees a gross and
injurious calumny put into circulation which he is able to refute from
direct knowledge, to challenge it at once, and more especially if it is
aimed at his own people, and meant to be used to their injury.  It is
true that in those regions for which calumnies are prepared, they are too
generally prepared to the truth, even when the truth is offered; but the
duty of affirming the truth is no less stringent on those who are able to
affirm it.  It is with this view that the following paper is written to
correct certain statements which recently appeared in Appleton's Journal,
professing to relate facts gleaned during a trip to Andersonville, GA,
concerning the Confederate military prison there and the treatment of
Federal prisoners.  Instead of reviewing the article in detail, I will
merely take up, one by one, the principal false statements.


It was my fortune to be stationed at Andersonville almost from the first
establishment of the prison until the removal to Millen, GA, or Camp
Lawton, and I unhesitatingly pronounce the statement that "the prisoners
had to drink the water that conveyed the offal of three camps and two
large bakeries off before it reached them" utterly false.  The guards
drank of the same water that quenched the prisoners' thirst, cooked their
food with the same water, the same large stream or creek flowing through
the encampment of guards and stockade, or "prison pen" as the Northern
writers sneeringly call it.  The camps of the guards all faced the
stream, while their sinks were far off in the rear, and orders were most
strict not to muddy the stream, much less defile it in any way.  As to
the offal of the bakeries, these being presided over by prisoners on
parole, and who did the cooking for the entire prison, I do not believe
they would pollute the water their brother prisoners had to drink.  As
rapidly as they could, the prisoners dug wells; in all some two hundred
were dug, and purer, sweeter, cold water I never drank.  Being on the
staff of Captain Wirz, I had free access to the prison at all times day
or night, and whenever I wished to quench my thirst, I went inside the
prison and drank from one of these wells.


That "Providential Spring" is an impious myth.  I have been in the prison
a thousand times and never before heard it so called, except on reading
the Herald's account of the anniversary of the Fulton Street Prayer
Meeting, when some pharisaically pious old brother recited a long
rigmarole about this same "Providential Spring", and said it was planted
there in direct answer to prayer.  The gist of this spring tale is that
when prisoners' sickness and suffering from thirst was at its greatest,
all at once this spring burst forth in direct answer to prayer.  Was
there ever such blasphemy?  If such was the case, why does the spring
still exist after it has answered its purpose?  Do those rocks of Horeb
struck by Moses to slake the children of Israel's thirst still exist, and
at this late day the water rush forth?  It is all a cock-and-bull story,
and unlike Sternes, one of the poorest I ever heard.


If my recollection serves me right, there was yet another of these same
"Providential Springs" inside the stockade, and that Providence who sends
the rain alike on the just and the unjust gave unto the wicked and
ungodly Rebels three of these "Providential Springs" and I am sure he did
not plant ours in answer to prayer, for we had just as leave drank the
branch water.


The Confederate Government has always been harshly assailed for its want
of humanity in not having barracks to house the prisoners from the sun
and rains.  A more senseless hue and cry was never heard.  How was it
possible to saw timber into planks without saw-mills?  There were two
water-power mills distant three and six miles respectively, but such rude
primitive affairs undeserving the name.  The nearest steam saw-mill was
twenty-three miles distant (near Smithville), the next at Reynolds, about
fifty miles distant; but the great bulk of lumber used, fully two-thirds,
was brought from Gordon, a distance of eighty miles.  Even if these mills
had had the capacity to supply the necessary amount of lumber, it would
still have been impossible to have provided barracks for the prisoners,
as all the available engines of all the railroads in the Confederacy were
taxed to their utmost capacity in transporting supplies for the army in
the field and to the prisons.  But few even of the officers of the guard
had shanties, these few were built of slabs and sheeting, which every one
knows is the refuse of the mills.  And even though there was no lack of
lumber, when we remember that there was but one solitary manufactory of
cut nails in the limits of the Confederacy, certainly no blame could be
attached to the authorities for not furnishing more comfortable quarters
for them.  Nearly every building in the encampment was built of rough
logs and covered with clap-boards split from the tree and held to their
places by poles.  The force of these statements is readily appreciated by
every intelligent and unprejudiced mind.  Besides, is it customary for
any nation in time of war to treat their prisoners in a more humane
manner than their own soldiers in the field?  The inquiry becomes
pertinent when we reflect that during the last two years of the war,
there was not a tent of any description to be found in any of the armies
of the Confederacy save such as were captured from the Federals.


The stockade was built by the negroes belonging to the neighboring farms,
either hired or pressed into sevice by the Confederate authorities to cut
down the immense pine trees growing on the ground intended for the
stockade; and these same trees were then cut into proper lengths and hewn
on the spot, then planted in a ditch dug four feet deep to receive them. 
In this manner was the stockade made.  Before it was completed the
prisoners were forwarded in great numbers, and it being impossible to
keep them in the cars, we had to put them in the completed end of the
stockade and double the guard, our whole force kept ever ready day and
night for the slightest alarm; for at first we only had the shattered
remnants of two regiments, the 26th of Alabama and the 55th of Georgia,
numbering in all, some three hundred and fifty men.  This constituted the
guard.  In about ten days thereafter my regiment, 1st Georgia Reserves,
composed of young boys and old men, (I was not sixteen) just organized,
were sent to take the place of the 26th Alabama and 55th Georgia, so they
could be sent to the front for duty.  In a few days after our arrival the
2d, 3d and 4th Georgia Reserves, all composed of lads and hoary-headed
men, for we were reduced to the strait of "robbing the cradle and the
grave for men to make soldiers", joined us rapidly as they could be
organized.  The author of "Jaunt in the South" says: "When the stockade
was occupied in 1864, there was not a tree nor a blade of grass within
it.  Its reddish sand was entirely barren, and not the smallest particle
of green showed itself.  But now the surface is covered completely with
underbrush; a rich growth of bushes, trees and plants has covered the
entire area, and where before there was a dreary desert, there is now a
wild and luxurious garden."  I have before said the ground was covered
with a pine forest, and the trees were utilized to build the stockade. 
Any one who has traveled south of Macon, GA, knows the pine is abundant,
and in fact, almost the only tree.  In these forests the ground is
covered with wire grass and other grass peculiar to them.


The main reasons for locating the prison at Andersonville after its first
being thought the most secure place in the Confederacy from the Yankee
cavalry raids, was the abundance of water and timber, wherewith to
construct the prison rapidly, and its being the very heart of the grain
growing section of the South, which would make it less inconvenient to
supply with provisions such a vast multitude.


In the summer of 1867 I set out for New York, being resolved to live no
longer in the South where negroes were being placed over us by Yankee
bayonets, and in their vernacular, "de bottom rail was agittin' on de top
er de fence."  I travelled very leisurely and stopped in every city of
any note on my route, and kept eyes and ears wide open to drink in
everything.  I visited the Ohio State Capitol at Columbus, and in the
museum of curiosities were some small paper boxes carefully preserved in
a glass case, containing what purported to be the exact quality and
quatity of ration issued per diem at Andersonville.  In one box was about
a pint of coarse unbolted meal, and in another about one table-spoonful
of rice, and still another box with about two table-spoons of black peas;
and in a tiny little box was about one-eighth of a tea-spoonful of salt. 
Underneath it is all explained, and says among other things: "When rice
was given the peas were withheld, but when they had no rice this kind of
peas were given instead."  It is needless to say how my blood boiled at
this atrocious, malicious and damnably false exhibition.  No wonder the
hatred of the North is kept alive, and the bloody chasm continually
widened by such wicked and uncharitable displays as this in one of the
largest and most enlightened States in the Union.


I was for three months a clerk in the commissary department at
Andersonville, and it was my business to weigh out rations to the guards
and prisoners alike, and I solemnly assert that the prisoners got ounce
for ounce and pound for pound of just the same quantity and quality of
food as did the guards.  The State authorities of Ohio ought to blush at
thus traducing  and slandering a fallen foe, and never in the first
instance to have placed on exhibition for preservation as truth this
fabrication of partisan hate.  No Andersonville prisoner, unless he were
lost to all sense of honor and shame, could make such a statement as that
the rations were no more than the specimens shown.


It has been charged as a crying shame upon the Confederacy by ignorant
humanitarians that the South might at least have given the prisoners
wheat bread occasionally; that they rarely ate corn bread in their own
land, and that the bread we issued was made of meal so coarse and
unsifted that it caused dysentery, thereby largely increasing the
mortality.  It is well known now that the South depends very largely, and
with shame I confess it, on the West for her bread and bacon, and the
cotton belt proper makes but little pretensions of raising wheat, for the
climate is said is unsuited; so that the region round about
Andersonville, being in the very heart of the cotton-growing section of
Georgia, such a thing as feeding prisoners on flour was impossible, and
the little flour that was obtained as tithes (one-tenth of all the crops
raised was required by our Government) was devoted entirely to the use of
the hospital.  Not only was this true of the territory immediately
surrounding Andersonville, but of the whole South.  Our armies were
unsupplied with flour, and perhaps not one family in fifty throughout the
whole land enjoyed that luxury.  The guards ate the same bread, or rather
meal; the bread eaten by the prisoners being baked by the regular bakers
(prisoners detailed for that purpose), while the guards did their own
cooking.  The meal, however, was the same, and both were unsifted and in
truth very coarse.  I ate the unsifted meal always.


Another cry of holy horror is raised every time the "Dead Line" is
mentioned, as if this dead-line was prima facie evidence that the
Southerners were as barbarous and cruel a race as ever blotted the face
of the earth.  The civilized North, however, had the same barbarous
dead-line in their prisons, and in fact originated the device.  It was a
necessity with us, for we never had at one time more than 1200 to 1500
guards in the four regiments fit for duty, and we had the keeping at one
time of nearly 40,000 prisoners.  By a concerted plan of onslaught, they
could at any time have scaled the walls, captured the guards, and with
the weapons of their keepers overrun the entire country, which, all south
of Dalton, GA, (100 miles north of Atlanta), was left wholly unprotected
save by gray-haired old men and young boys; and the women, children and
negroes, who were the only hope for the making of crops for our armies,
would have been helplessly at their mercy.  This dead line was clearly
defined and consisted of stakes driven into the ground twenty feet from
the walls of the stockade, and on these stakes was a three-inch strip of
plant nailed all around the inside of the prison.  They were all notified
that a step beyond this line was not prudent, and they were not so unwise
as to venture beyond that limit.


Speaking of the number and burial of the dead, the writer of the
aforesaid "Jaunt" says: "The authorities at the stockade who had charge
of the interment of the Federal dead, did their work rudely, digging pits
and burying them in", then he goes on: "It is hard to comprehend the true
value of the number 14,000; its magnitude eludes you.  Fourteen thousand
men form a great mob, or a great army, or a great town.  Here you have
14,000 men lying silently in a few acres.  Within these bounds men have
suffered as greatly as have any since the world began."  In reply to this
I would merely say, the burial was the work of prisoners paroled
especially for the purpose, both the hauling of the bodies to the ground,
the digging of the graves and even the records of the names were all done
by paroled prisoners.  Books and a tent were provided soley for the
latter purpose.  Owing to the weakness of the guard, paroled prisoners
were employed for this duty, as we could spare no men for the purpose;
and if the work was rudely or carelessly done, the blame rests with them.
 As compensation they were given double rations and almost entire
freedom.  As to the number of dead we admit that it is great, but
statistics show that more Southern soldiers died in Northern prisons than
Northern soldiers in Southern prisons.  In vain have Northern writers
tried to disprove this fact.


Great as was the mortality among the prisoners, it was no greater in
proportion to the number than that of the guards, which is fully attested
by the reports of the surgeon in charge.  Besides, it is well-known to
every soul that can or does read, that the Confederacy, through their
agent, Judge Ould, made frequent and tireless efforts to get the United
States Government, through their agent, General Butler, to exchange.  But
no, the Federal authorities would not hear to it; but acting on the
avowed and promulgated idea that the South, being blockaded, could not
recruit her armies from foreign lands, while to the North the whole of
Europe was opened, they cruelly determined not to exchange, so as to
detain our soldiers from again fighting them, well knowing even then we
had made our last conscription (17 to 50 years) and when those we had
were killed up or in prison, we could of course be overpowered.  This was
their cold-blooded, brutal policy; and closely did they stick to it even
till were almost literally wiped out, while the men they had fighting us
were in the most part hired substitutes, drafted men and foreign


Farther, as to the mortality among the prisoners, let it be remembered
that a majority of the deaths caused in our prisons was want of proper
medicines, which we did not have and could not get, except by
blockade-running.  Had the Federal Government any of the milk of human
kindness in its composition, it would have acceded to our earnest request
to take cotton in exchange for drugs to administer their own dying
soldiers.  Their immense manufactories were lying idle for the want of
cotton, while we had it but could not use it.  But as these self-same
drugs and medicines would also be applied to the relief of our own sick
soldiers, they determined it would be to their advantage to let all die
alike, knowing that the South could get no more men to supply the places
of the sick and dying, and these they had imprisoned, and so refused all
overtures.  After using every effort and exhausting every argument to get
an exchange, we proposed as we had no medicines and could get none,
except what we accidentally ran in through the blockade from Europe,
(they being declared contraband and always confiscated whenever captured
by the blockade fleet) we proposed to turn over to them all their sick,
without requiring man for man, but giving them absolutely up, if the
United States would only send vessels for transporting them.  This was
done at Camp Lawton (Millen, GA), after the prison was removed from
Andersonville for greater security.


>From the private journal of a Confederate officer high in command, both
at Andersonville and other Southern prisons, I glean the annexed facts,
the first bearing directly upon the foregoing: "At one time an order came
to Camp Lawton to prepare 2000 men for exchange.  The order from Richmond
was to select first the wounded, next the oldest prisoners and sickly,
filling up with healthy men according to date.  This partly went first to
Savannah, as arranged, but by some mistake the ships were at Charleston,
and the poor wretches had to be taken there; and every one who knew the
Southern railroads in those days, and the difficulty or rather
impossibility to procure food for such a crowd along the road, will know
what those poor fellows suffered.  At Charleston they were refused, the
commissioner declaring that he was not going to exchange able-bodied men
for such specimens of humanity.  (The term used was more brutal.) 
Finding him obdurate, Colonel Ord requested him to take them without
exchange.  This he refused with a sneering laugh, and the crowd was
ordered back.  Never did the writer of this witness such woe-begone
countenances, in which misery and hopelessness were more strongly
painted, than shown by these poor fellows on their return.  And the
curses leveled against the rulers who thus treated the defenders of their
country were fearful, although certainly well deserved.  As the stockade
gate closed upon them the surgeon in charge said to the writer: "Poor
fellows! the world has closed upon more than half of them; their
disappointment will be their death-knell."  His words proved true.  Who
murdered these men?  Let history answer the question.


Again I extract from the aforesaid journal: The Northerners talk much of
the cruelty of the South to Federal prisoners.  At one time the
unfortunate prisoners were almost without clothing, indeed some hardly
had as much as common decency required.  The South could not provide
them, not being able to clothe their own men.  An application was made to
Seward.  The reply was that "the Federal Government did not supply
clothing to prisoners of war."  Luckily for the poor fellows, a society
in New York took the matter in hand, and several bales of clothing and
cases of shoes were forwarded to Richmond, and divided in proportion to
numbers, among the prisoners.


A great deal has been said of the cruelty to the prisoners inside the
stockade.  This so-called cruelty was inflicted by their own men.  In
every prison a police and a chief, all from the prisoners, was appointed
to keep order, see to the enforcement of the regulations, and inquire
into all offenses, reporting through their chief to the Commandant.  The
punishment, such as were used in the Federal army, were ordered inflicted
by these men, and some were of such a barbarous nature that they were
prohibited with disgust by Confederate officers, who substituted milder
and more humane ones; and yet the former were in common practice in the
Federal armies, as testified by all the prisoners.


Among the numerous lies invented by Northerners, and actually still
believed by some parties to this day, was the story that the Confederates
used to hunt and worry prisoners with bloodhounds.  Now it is well-known
that the breed of bloodhounds is nearly extinct in the South, and the
large packs of those dogs alluded to by writers on the subject existed
only in their imaginations, the prolific brains of penny-a-liners, whose
vile and lying compositions now abound in any so-called respectable New
York papers; no public man is safe from their ferocious attacks.  Among
the various specimens of this dog alluded to by the above named gentry,
was the famous bloodhound of the Libby Prison.  The writer has often seen
this formidable animal, which certainly in his youth must have been as
fine a specimen of the kind as could be met anywhere, but unfortunately
for the thrilling portion of the accounts of his doings at the time of
the war, the poor beast, worn out with old age with hardly a tooth in his
head, wandered about a harmless, inoffensive creature.  He was the
property of the Commandant of Libby, who kept him because he was a pet
dog of his father's, and there the brute lived a pensioner in his old
age.  As to his worrying men, he could not, had he even tried, have
worried a child.  The other prisons had none, not even as pensioners. 
Among the records history gives us of using those dogs to hunt men, it is
stated that during the Florida war a number of bloodhounds were imported
by the Federal Government from Cuba to hunt the Indians out of the
Everglades, and that numbers of the natives were worried to death by the
ferocious beasts.  The writer does not deny that when a prisoner got out
of the stockade trying to escape, if no clue could be obtained of his
whereabouts, a few mongrel or half-breed fox hounds were used to track
him, but the worrying was all done in the correspondent's own brain. 
However, it suited the times and made the article sell.  The only
complaint made is that this vile and malicious lie is still, if not
believed, repeated by some who use it for party purposes, and thus help
to keep up the bad feeling between the North and the South.


So never shake your gory locks or point your guilty finger at the South
for the dead who died in Southern prisons.  History, with impartial pen
will place the guilt and censure of the damning deed at the door of the
insulter of defenseless women, the plunder of New Orleans, and the murder
of Mrs. Surratt, or as he is admiringly called by his worshippers, "the
great Secretary", Edwin M. Stanton and their backers, the members of the
United States Congress.  History will also declare Captain Wirz to have
been as foully and willfully murdered ers as Mrs. Surratt.  Though a rude
pro ers fane man, he was never guilty of heartless cruelty while I was
under him, a period of over three months, until the prisoners removal to
Camp Lawton.  The day will come when his memory will be fully vindicated;
now the attempt is vain.

I will add that this article has not been written either for fame or
money.  It has been prepared amid the pressure of business engagements
and at necessarily detached intervals, and is prompted solely by a sense
of duty to vindicate the cause of truth and the claims of an outraged


Up ] [ andersonville2.htm ] Elmira Portal to Hell ] Elmira Roster ] Libby Prison Richmond Virgina ] THE ELMIRA OBSERVATORY ] Hon. A. M. Keiley Pt Look out ] Dr. I. W. K. Handy POW Experience ] Reverand George Harris ]