280
CHAPTER XVI
Average Crop Yield of Monroe County
for 1895, and Other Statistical Items.
The following figures
are taken from the Iowa Agricultural Report for 1895.
The average yield per
acre of agricultural products was:
| Winter wheat, bushels |
22 |
| Corn, bushels |
40 |
| Oats, bushels |
34 |
| Rye, bushels |
16 |
| Timothy seed, bushels |
3.6 |
| Clover seed, bushels |
2 |
| Millet seed, bushels |
18 |
| Potatoes, bushels |
134 |
| Sweet potatoes, bushels |
136 |
| Buckwheat, bushels |
141 |
| Sorghum, gallons |
108 |
| Hay, timothy, tons |
1 |
For these staple products,
the prices on December 1st averaged as follows:
| Winter wheat |
$0.42 |
| Corn |
.19 |
| Oats |
.14 |
| Rye |
.20 |
| Timothy seed |
1.32 |
| Clover seed |
4.50 |
| Millet |
.25 |
| Potatoes |
.20 |
| Sweet potatoes |
.87 |
| Buckwheat |
.45 |
| Sorghum |
.55 |
| Hay, timothy |
7.00 |
The average price per
head for cows on same date was $28, and that of horses
$34.
In 1895 there were 10
counties in Iowa which gave a higher yield per acre
of winter wheat than Monroe County. The counties of
Greene, Tama, and Guthrie averaged 25

281
bushels per acre, which was the biggest.
Carroll, Dallas, and Adair gave an average of 24 bushels
to the acre, and Palo Alto, Frémont County,
showing 50 bushels per acre; while that of Monroe
County was 40 bushels. The highest average yield of
oats was made by Montgomery County, showing 71 bushels
per acre; while that of Monroe was 34.
For the present year (1896)
the average yield for Monroe County of the foregoing
staples will be much greater than for 1895, with the
exception of the oat crop. The growth of the latter
crop was so exuberant that a large proportion of the
acreage within the county blew down before it was
headed out, and it did not fill well. The corn crop
is probably the heaviest the county has ever produced,
and its average yield per acre will reach nearly that
of the corn counties bordering on the Missouri River.
During the last three
or four years the yield per acre of the hay crop has
been decreasing, though the average has not been reduced.
This is mainly owing to the gradual usurpation of
the fields of timothy by blue-grass. During the recent
seasons of drought the timothy, making a light growth,
and in many cases yielding no seed, permitted the
blue-grass to take its place. The blue-grass, maturing
the earliest of all grasses, made a rapid growth in
the spring, when there was a little moisture in the
earth. Its seed matured, germinated, and choked out
the timothy, which had about succumbed to the dry
weather.
The most protracted drought
will not kill blue-grass. It becomes parched and brown,
and even its roots become dried out and apparently
dead. In this condition the plant will lie dormant
for months; but when the rains come, the roots return
to life and the plant soon regains its verdure. It
grows in great profusion on all kinds of soil, and
especially on unimproved lands and timber soil, and
affords valuable grazing for live stock.
In 1895 there were 1,215,437
head of horses in the State of Iowa, and of this number
Monroe County had 8,961. There were only 9 counties
in the State having a less num-

282
ber—viz., the counties of Osceola,
Dickinson, Emmett, Winnebago, Worth, Hancock, Palo
Alto, Ida, and Pocahontas. Pottawattamie County had
21,695, and showed the largest number; and Dickinson
County, with her 5,211 head, showed the smallest number.
In 1895 Iowa had 3,273,525
head of cattle, of which number Monroe County had
14,546. Fayette County showed 37,910 head, being the
highest number; and Emmett County had the smallest
number—7,720 head.
In the same year there
were 3,895,316 head of hogs in the State, and Monroe
County had 6,763 head. Cedar County stood first with
her 67,593 head; and Dickinson County came last, with
but 4,847.
In 1895 Monroe County
had 12 cheese factories, far out-numbering any other
county in the State; the next highest number being
in Humboldt County, in which there are but 5.
While Monroe County stands
without a rival as the banner cheese-producing county
in the State, she contains but 1 creamery. Bremer
County has 28, Dubuque 27, Jones 20, Fayette 22, and
Linn 24.
Some years ago the farmers
of Monroe County tested the relative profits yielded
by these two industries. A creamery was established
at Albia under the management of competent and experienced
managers. Milk routes were established throughout
the county, traversing almost to the remotest parts.
The milk was brought to the creamery every day by
wagons sent out by the creamery. At the same time
the cheese industry had gotten fairly under way; but,
after a test of one season, the farmers and dairymen
decided that there was more profit in sending their
milk to the cheese factories, and in thus supporting
the latter, the former industry was abandoned.
Monroe County contains
271,408 acres of land, whose assessed valuation in
1895 was $2,320,235. This valuation included town
lots. The assessed valuation of personal property
was $680,498. The assessed valuation of railroad property
was $579,342, making a total assessment valuation
of $3,580,175.
The State tax for the
same was $9,194.85; and the county, district, and
city taxes were $97,846.
In 1896 Monroe County
contained a population of 15,870

283
people. There were also 5,269 youth
enumerated in the county in that year.
The amount of the permanent
fund held by Monroe County in 1895 was $60,912.14,
and the amount of interest apportioned was $890.46.
To-day there are doubtless
20,000 or 30,000 acres of wild land in Monroe County,
lying idle. While it presents considerable diversity
in quality, the most of it is good soil, and will
afford good pleasant homes to those who have the brawn
and sinew and enterprise to occupy and develop it.
The greater part of this land consists of timber and
brush lands, and at present can be bought at from
$5 to $20 per acre, averaging say $12 per acre. Of
course, the locality in many cases is not at present
the most enjoyable; but, with the rapid change in
conditions which is steadily taking place, the remotest
fastnesses of the county are destined in a dozen years
hence to emerge into a happier and more advanced state
of civilization. The refining influence of education
is reaching out on every hand, wealth and enterprise
join hands with education, and with their combined
influence the county will improve and each succeeding
generation will be an improvement on its predecessor.
School-houses and better public roads are breaking
up the coarser phases of rural life. There is no locality
within the county so remote from civilization but
that the farmer can get his mail in a half-hour's
drive. With his good team and carriage, he now drives
to the county seat after supper; whereas in former
years, it took him about all day to make the trip
with his team of "plugs" and heavy lumber
wagon.
Every foot of tillable
Monroe County soil ought to be in cultivation. The
poorest farm in the county will at least furnish a
home for somebody. Nobody has ever been known to starve
to death on a Monroe County farm. He can contrive
to make a living, at least, and make it honestly.
He has the satisfaction of sitting under the shade
of his own apple-tree, and the land is his, clear
down to the center of the earth. For $400 or $500
he may be able to purchase a solid section of the
earth, a quarter of a mile wide, a quarter of a mile
deep and over 3,000 miles in length. It cannot be
taken from him for debt, and his domicile cannot be
broken into by force, without legal permission. He
has a right to defend his domicile against the invasion
of others, even to the extremity of depriving the
intruder of life.

284
To be the owner of land
adds dignity to citizenship. He is a "free-holder,"
and enjoys rights and privileges of franchise not
accorded to those who are not owners of realty. He
can borrow money and secure the loan by real estate
security, when other could not negotiate the same
loan, through they offered the most abundant security
in the nature of personal effects. Security for loan
of school or other public funds must be based on real
estate. It is property which thieves cannot break
in and steal, nor moth corrupt.

Bee Culture.
Bee culture, as a commercial
industry, has within recent years been occupying the
attention of a few of the farmers throughout the county.
Ever since the country was first settled, the people
have kept a few colonies of bees for home consumption
of honey, but, beyond supplying their own tables,
the enterprise has been attended with varying results—in
most instances with failure.
The methods pursued by
the bee-keepers of former years were very primitive.
The common form of a bee-hive was a section of a hollow
log about four feet long, and any diameter from a
foot up to two feet. About midway in this "gum"
two cross-sticks were inserted as a support for the
honeycomb. A broad board was nailed over one end of
the "gum," as a roof, and the bottom end
was left open. To get at the honey, the bee-man took
the family ax, and with its edge pried up the cover
sufficiently to blow smoke into the hive. As soon
as the smoke reaches a bee it capitulates, but before
this stage of the attack, the farmer expected to ge
stung a half-dozen times at least, for the slightest
jarring of the hive will bring a horde of intrepid
warriors from out the hive. He did not seriously object
to their stinging him if they did it in a satisfactory
way, but they would never do that; they would invariably
crawl up his pants-leg, and, before getting in their
work, strike terror into the hear of the farmer by
a kind of premonitory humming. The agony of this suspense
was further increased by the sensation produced by
the bee climbing slowly up his bare leg. A man with
a strong heart and iron nerve could sometimes stand
this, but when a bee got into his whiskers, he grew
panicky and his iron nerve ran riot. His first instinct
was to call to his wife for assistance, but invariably
she remained at her

285
post in the kitchen door, laughing at
him until with a wild yell he broke for some neighboring
shrubbery, followed by a train of winged pursuers.
Sometimes he never ventured back to replace the cover
on the "gum."

Apiary of C. H. Clark.
(click on image for larger size)
Then, if he did not succeed
in subduing the bees, he spoiled the honey in digging
it out of the hive with a knife and spoon, and usually
drowned half the bees in the torrents

286
of honey flowing from the lacerated
comb. Honey in this condition was, of course, unfit
for market; and he only aimed to produce enough for
home consumption.
Later, when patent hives
were introduced, they were all more or less unsatisfactory,
and did not conform to the instincts of the bee.
Within recent years, however,
the bee-hive has been highly perfected, and the bee
industry, which is still practically in its infancy,
in Monroe County, is already achieving gratifying
results.
C. H. Clark, a son of
the late Wareham G. Clark,
and who resides five or six miles southwest of Albia,
has no doubt pursued the industry with the most conspicuous
success of any bee-keepers in the county. He has at
present from 40 to 60 colonies, but intends to increase
the number to at least 100. He has his apiary on 88
acres of land, and estimates that on a area of 6 square
miles 100 colonies of bees could be successfully maintained.
He uses a nine-frame hive, and his experience has evolved
some very important facts. He uses a square frame instead
of one rectilinear in form. His reasons for adopting
this form of frame are: the queen been invariably builds
her cell in the center, and for some reason, bet known
to the bee itself, bees build their supply of hone above
the queen's apartment, and leave the lower portion for
brood-cells and bee-bread. When Mr. Clark finds the
upper half of the frame filled with honey, he removes
the frame and turns it upside down, and by thus shifting
the position of the frame until all four sides have
been in their turn changed, the bees are forced to build
in the boxes above, when they would otherwise have selected
the frames.
From Mr. Clark's experience, he has determined
that 100 colonies will produce 6,000 pounds of honey
in a season. He sells his honey at from 10 cents to
20 cents per pound. If his product averaged 15 cents
per pound at wholesale, 100 colonies would yield him
a profit of $900 annually. Forty acres of land would
be all the land necessary, and he could follow farming
besides. He could sow say 10 acres of buckwheat to facilitate
his bees in their honey-gathering, but they would not
be altogether dependent on that, as the forest bloom,
such as basswood, white clover, fruit blossoms, field
clover, and the wilderness of asters, golden rod, and
other yellow wild flowers that bloom in the early autumn
along fence-rows, highways, and stubble-fields, usually
make abundant

287
food for bees. Of course there would be
seasons through which he would have to feed his bees
perhaps all winter.
Mr. Clark has two varieties
of bees, the Italian and Carinolia. He thinks the Italian
is the best, because it can reach the honey cavity in
a large proportion of the red field clover bloom. The
Carinolia is bee imported from Austria, and he considers
this variety next best, having in his apiary about 20
colonies.
The first to engage in bee
culture in this county was Peter Brown. Oaks and Bachelor
next started an apiary, but soon abandoned the enterprise.
Within recent years R. B.
Arnold, of Urbana Township, has been pursuing the industry
quite successfully in connection with horticulture and
farming. He has 30 colonies, and intends to keep on
increasing the number.
Henry Burner, Austin Jay,
L. Snow, David Kenworthy, Alfred Weilman, and others
are successful bee-raisers in Monroe County.
Mr. Clark, whose judgment
in all practical matters can be fully relied on, states
that from his personal experience, bee culture in Monroe
County can be made a highly remunerative industry, and
he earnestly recommends its investigation.

Political.
The political cast of Monroe
County for many years has been pretty evenly divided,
the two dominant parties being the Republican and Democratic
parties.
For many years there has
also been a third party within the county, known under
various names, such as the Greenback party, Union Labor
party, Prohibition party, and Populist party of the
present time.
These various third party
organizations, save the Prohibitionists, derive most
of their recruits from the Democratic party; hence they
have exhibited a more cordial feeling towards the latter
party than towards the Republican party, and it is not
uncommon for the Democratic party and the third party,
whatever it may be, to fuse on a county ticket. When
this course is taken, the Republican party is often
in a slight minority; but when all three parties bring
out a separate local ticket, then the Republicans are
in the ascendency. The increased mining population has
added strength to the Populist party of the present
time, since

a large majority of the miners favor the
Populist doctrine. The Democratic and Populist parties
were of about equal strength in the earlier part of
1896, but later in the season the free silver agitation,
then at its height, drew many Democrats into the Populists
ranks, and left the Democratic party third in rank.
The following official tables
show the strength of the respective political parties
in the county from 1889 to 1895. The vote was on State
officers.
1895
|
Drake |
Babb |
Crane |
| Pleasant |
88 |
48 |
42 |
| Bluff Creek |
117 |
25 |
31 |
| Union |
95 |
72 |
22 |
| Cedar |
51 |
50 |
46 |
| Wayne |
21 |
61 |
24 |
| Georgetown (precinct) |
26 |
40 |
22 |
| Hiteman (precinct) |
104 |
33 |
164 |
| Troy |
142 |
30 |
63 |
| Albia, 1st Ward |
84 |
30 |
21 |
| " 2d Ward |
94 |
45 |
17 |
| " 3d Ward |
62 |
15 |
12 |
| " 4th Ward |
92 |
35 |
37 |
| Mantua |
79 |
14 |
24 |
| Avery (precinct) |
14 |
10 |
105 |
| Urbana |
55 |
62 |
33 |
| Hilton (precinct) |
57 |
54 |
18 |
| Foster (precinct) |
30 |
30 |
74 |
| Franklin |
39 |
50 |
36 |
| Jackson |
62 |
136 |
14 |
Total |
1367 |
848 |
805 |
1894
| |
McFarland |
Dale |
Crane |
| Pleasant |
134 |
58 |
69 |
| Bluff Creek |
131 |
23 |
23 |
| Union |
113 |
80 |
29 |
| Cedar |
67 |
52 |
56 |
| Wayne |
32 |
71 |
16 |
| Georgetown (precinct) |
32 |
54 |
16 |
| Hiteman (precinct) |
111 |
24 |
167 |
| Troy |
131 |
26 |
65 |

289
| |
McFarland |
Dale |
Crane |
| Albia, 1st Ward |
104 |
26 |
17 |
| " 2d Ward |
116 |
24 |
24 |
| " 3d Ward |
62 |
13 |
12 |
| " 4th Ward |
95 |
32 |
34 |
| Mantua |
81 |
12 |
29 |
| Avery (precinct) |
81 |
11 |
125 |
| Urbana |
58 |
68 |
27 |
| Foster (precinct) |
45 |
22 |
73 |
| Hilton (precinct) |
74 |
41 |
18 |
| Franklin |
61 |
54 |
38 |
| Jackson |
70 |
137 |
8 |
Total |
1618 |
832 |
846 |
1893
| |
Jackson |
Boies |
Joseph |
| Pleasant |
117 |
83 |
32 |
| Bluff Creek |
126 |
31 |
10 |
| Union |
85 |
80 |
23 |
| Cedar |
48 |
68 |
22 |
| Wayne |
38 |
75 |
11 |
| Georgetown (precinct) |
28 |
56 |
13 |
| Hiteman (precinct) |
100 |
29 |
132 |
| Troy |
147 |
39 |
52 |
| Albia, 1st Ward |
95 |
35 |
16 |
| " 2d Ward |
102 |
48 |
20 |
| " 3d Ward |
40 |
18 |
8 |
| " 4th Ward |
96 |
40 |
28 |
| Mantua |
136 |
44 |
108 |
| Urbana |
57 |
83 |
29 |
| Foster (precinct) |
45 |
37 |
65 |
| Hilton (precinct) |
78 |
41 |
16 |
| Franklin |
39 |
59 |
30 |
| Jackson |
74 |
130 |
8 |
Total |
1451 |
996 |
623 |
1892
| |
Cummings |
Witmer |
Joseph |
| Pleasant |
95 |
107 |
34 |
| Bluff Creek |
128 |
41 |
9 |

290
| |
Cummings |
Witmer |
Joseph |
| Cedar |
60 |
75 |
16 |
| Union |
103 |
105 |
25 |
| Wayne |
30 |
77 |
14 |
| Georgetown (precinct) |
37 |
60 |
14 |
| Hiteman (precinct) |
93 |
45 |
125 |
| Troy |
143 |
44 |
69 |
| Albia, 1st Ward |
103 |
37 |
12 |
| " 2d Ward |
107 |
46 |
13 |
| " 3d Ward |
45 |
20 |
4 |
| " 4th Ward |
96 |
51 |
15 |
| Mantua |
145 |
39 |
117 |
| Urbana |
55 |
107 |
15 |
| Hilton (precinct) |
78 |
50 |
17 |
| Foster (precinct) |
51 |
33 |
40 |
| Jackson |
73 |
151 |
3 |
Total |
1501 |
1169 |
550 |
1891
| |
Wheeler |
Boies |
Westfall |
| Pleasant |
89 |
126 |
11 |
| Bluff Creek |
148 |
53 |
1 |
| Union |
104 |
126 |
4 |
| Cedar |
82 |
98 |
1 |
| Wayne |
41 |
74 |
0 |
| Georgetown (precinct) |
16 |
87 |
5 |
| Hiteman (precinct) |
74 |
70 |
18 |
| Troy |
150 |
71 |
53 |
| Albia, 1st Ward |
112 |
55 |
3 |
| " 2d Ward |
99 |
46 |
10 |
| " 3d Ward |
54 |
24 |
1 |
| " 4th Ward |
93 |
77 |
4 |
| Mantua |
161 |
75 |
74 |
| Urbana |
56 |
110 |
3 |
| Hilton (precinct) |
86 |
55 |
2 |
| Foster (precinct) |
47 |
40 |
17 |
| Franklin |
72 |
88 |
0 |
| Jackson |
75 |
154 |
1 |
Total |
1559 |
1429 |
208 |

291
| |
McFarland |
Chamberlain |
Brown |
| Pleasant |
89 |
108 |
9 |
| Bluff Creek |
125 |
53 |
7 |
| Union |
108 |
111 |
4 |
| Cedar |
80 |
93 |
3 |
| Wayne |
34 |
76 |
1 |
| Georgetown (precinct) |
25 |
80 |
3 |
| Hiteman (precinct) |
55 |
46 |
10 |
| Troy |
172 |
78 |
23 |
| Albia, 1st Ward |
103 |
48 |
1 |
| " 2d Ward |
106 |
41 |
2 |
| " 3d Ward |
48 |
18 |
0 |
| " 4th Ward |
89 |
61 |
4 |
| Mantua |
140 |
95 |
20 |
| Urbana |
62 |
112 |
4 |
| Hilton (precinct) |
84 |
49 |
4 |
| Foster (precinct) |
46 |
28 |
25 |
| Franklin |
60 |
73 |
2 |
| Jackson |
68 |
155 |
1 |
Total |
1494 |
1325 |
125 |
1889
| |
Hutchinson |
Boies |
Downing |
| Pleasant |
102 |
150 |
6 |
| Bluff Creek |
128 |
49 |
9 |
| Union |
105 |
111 |
5 |
| Cedar |
67 |
77 |
2 |
| Wayne |
35 |
61 |
1 |
| Guilford |
42 |
90 |
0 |
| Troy |
148 |
86 |
13 |
| Albia, 1st Ward |
101 |
41 |
1 |
| " 2d Ward |
93 |
47 |
1 |
| " 3d Ward |
48 |
22 |
0 |
| " 4th Ward |
87 |
52 |
8 |
| Mantua |
146 |
93 |
19 |
| Urbana |
55 |
110 |
7 |
| Monroe |
100 |
82 |
5 |
| Franklin |
63 |
63 |
0 |
| Jackson |
65 |
134 |
1 |
Total |
1385 |
1268 |
78 |

292
In the foregoing tables
the first column of figures denote the Republican vote;
the second, the Democratic; and the third, the third
party vote. The figures given for 1892 were for presidential
electors.
At the general election
of 1895, the Republican vote for Governor, in Monroe
County, fell 54 votes short of the number cast for the
Lieutenant-Governor on the same ticket; Parrott receiving
1421 votes. During that campaign, there was also a Prohibition
vote in the county of 112 votes. A majority of these
were drawn from the Republican party. There were three
county tickets in the field—viz., the Republican,
Populist, and Democratic tickets. D. H. Scott, the Republican
nominee for Representative, received 1440 votes; McCauley,
Populist, 908; and Campbell, Democratic, 720.
In 1894 the Democrats and
Populists of Monroe County united their forces, but
the Republicans carried the county against their combined
vote. McCahan, Republican nominee for Clerk of the District
Court, received 1727 votes; and Moore, the fusion candidate,
1588 votes.
In 1893 the People's party
took the "middle of the road" and nominated
a county ticket of their own. The vote that year for
Representative was: Jay, Republican, 1475; Moss, Democrat,
894; Clarkson, People's party, 773.
In 1892, also there were
three local tickets in the field for a part of the offices
to be filled. McCahan, Republican, for Clerk of the
District Court, received 1483 votes; Wyatt, Democrat,
received 1205; and Bates, People's party, 524. John
R. Clark was elected Auditor by a fusion vote of the
People's part and Democrats. Morrissey was also elected
Recorder by Democrats and Populists.
The Democrats and People's
party fused in 1891, but the Republicans elected their
ticket in the face of the united opposition. Jay, Republican,
received 1601 votes; and Pettit, fusion candidate, 1587.
In 1890 the Democrats and
People's party advocates united their strength against
the Republicans, but were defeated by the latter. The
vote on Clerk of the District Court was: Griffin, Republican,
1666; Forster, fusionist, 1224.

Manufacturing.
Monroe County contains one
manufacturing concern of considerable—viz., the
Western Manufacturing

293
Company. This plant is located at Albia,
and was established in January, 1895. It incorporated
under the State laws, with an authorized capital stock
of about $50,000. The amount paid in, however, falls
below that sum. It organized with the following officers:
Fred Townsend, president; W. S. Scott, vice-president;
J. R. Clark, secretary and treasurer; W. S. Scott, H.
I. Clark, O. F. Smith, Chas. Israel, and E. C. Hulbert.

Works of the Western Manufacturing Company, Albia, Iowa
(click on image for larger size)
The plant was located at
Osceola, Iowa, prior to it organization in Monroe County,
but as this county offered better transportation and
fuel facilities, a local organization was formed of
Monroe County gentlemen, the machinery was brought here
and increased facilities added to the new organization.
The company builds a very popular pattern of hay-ricker
and rake; they also manufacture iron pumps of a high
grade, and other mechanical sundries.
The company has not been
in operation long enough here to solve the problem of
whether a manufacturing plant will succeed in Albia
or not. The greatest obstacle which inland manufacturing
enterprises have to encounter is the

294
large establishments of the manufacturing
centers, whose unlimited capacity enables them to reduce
all expenses to a minimum. Having this advantage, they
are enabled to place their products before consumers
at a price which will drive the smaller competitor into
bankruptcy. The superior merits of the product of the
Western Manufacturing Company, however, may achieve
for the company a fair degree of prosperity. The concern
usually employs from fifteen to twenty men. Its management
is in the hands of staunch and reliable business men.

Albia Canning Factory, Albia, Iowa
(click on image for larger size)
The Albia canning factory
was organized in 1894 as a joint stock company, incorporated
under the laws of the State. Its authorized capital
stock was $21,000, of which amount $10,500 was paid
up. The company was under the management of eleven directors:
E. W. Byers, Ed. A. Canning, John R. Duncan, Max Loeb,
J. S. Moon, A. A. Mason, John Forster, C. C. Acheson,
C. W. Smallwood, J. C. Robeson, and Tom D. Lockman.
E. W. Byers was president. Chas. W. Smallwood secretary,
and J. S. Moon treasurer.

Owing to the crop failure
of 1894, the management concluded to not operate the
factory that summer. On accepting the plant from contractors,
the directors started the machinery to see that everything
was in good working order. Everything appeared satisfactory,
and the company received the plant. On starting up in
1895, for the first time, it was found that the machinery,
and especially the engine, was not set properly, and
some expense was incurred in readjusting it. A well
was also lacking, also piping and other fixtures, to
supply all of which cost the company nearly a thousand
dollars.
The machinery for working
corn did not work satisfactorily the first season, and
a large quantity of the canned product spoiled. Then
the company paid the farmers more for the corn than
they ought to have done in order to realize any profit
on it. The result was that at the end of the first season's
operations the company found itself $2,000 poorer than
in the beginning. This, with the additional outlay incurred
by supplying the well and meeting other deficiencies,
discouraged the stockholders, and at a meeting it was
ordered that the factory be sold to pay off the indebtedness.
It was bought for $3,000 by Messrs. John Ralston, Max
Loeb, J. S. Moon, G. H. Hobson, Tom D. Lockman, and
R. O. Cramer, who are the present directors and proprietors.
The concern continues its
charter as an incorporated body, and its capital stock
is fixed at $3,000, all of which is fully paid up. It
is establishing itself on a prosperous basis at present,
and is under the management of R. O. Cramer.
Albia also contains a drain-tile
factory, but it is not in operation at the present time.
It is under the management of J. W. Harvey. It is not
in a flourishing condition, owing to inability on the
part of the proprietor to find a steady market for the
product of the factory.
Chapter XVII
Return
to top

|