|


CHAPTER VII
THE INTERCOURSE ACT OF 1834,
AND PROGRESS OF THE INDIAN TRIBES
Referring to the work of
the commissioners who had been sent to the Indian
country in 1832, Secretary of War Cass, in his report
of December, 1833, says that among the tasks remaining
for the commissioners, "one of the most interesting
is a practical plan for regulating the intercourse
of the various tribes, with one another and with the
United States, and for the establishment of some general
principles by which their own internal government
can be safely administered by themselves, and a general
superintending authority exercised by the United States."
The result was the act of Congress, of
June 30, 1834, known as the Indian Intercourse Act.1
It has been sometimes stated that this piece of legislation
created Indian Territory, and the history of the Territory
has often been made to date from this act. But a reading
of the previous pages shows that the Indian country
was the result of numerous treaties with tribes east
of the Mississippi and the general policy of collocation
of the Indians as adopted by the government years
before Congress passed this act. This act is best
described as the "intercourse act" since
it regulated the relations which were thenceforward,
with occasional amendment, to subsist between the
legal residents of the Indian country and the surrounding
states and territories. But among other provisions,
the act directed "that all that part of the United
States west of the Mississippi and not within the
states of Missouri and Louisiana, or the territory
of Arkansas, . . . . be taken and deemed to be the
Indian country." Hence arose the misconception
that this act created Indian Territory, though careful
reading shows that the domain thus set aside contained
an area much greater than that later known in geographies
as "Indian Territory."
The intercourse act was a most important
piece of legislation. Under its provisions the development
of the Indian country proceeded for many years. The
regulations provided were sufficient, so far as effective
legislation was concerned, until after the Civil war.
Among other provisions of this act were
those concerning the licensing (for a not longer period
than three years) of all persons engaged in trade
in the Indian country, and the regulation of intercourse
with the Indians, including fine and removal of all
persons unauthorized to reside in the country. No
hunting, trapping or grazing of cattle, nor settlement
of any white persons should be permitted. Liquor traffic
within the Indian country was prohibited in all forms.
For legal purposes the Indian country
was attached to Missouri and Arkansas. Section 24
reads: "That for the sole purpose of carrying
this act into effect, all that part of the Indian
country west of the Mississippi river, that is bounded
north by the
76
|

77
north line of lands assigned to the
Osage tribe of Indians, produced east to the state
of Missouri; west by the Mexican possession; south,
by Red river; and east, by the west line of the territory
of Arkansas and the state of Missouri, shall be, and
hereby is, annexed to the territory of Arkansas,"
. . . . the Indian country to the north being annexed
to the judicial district of Missouri.
The criminal laws of the United States
were declared in force in the Indian country, but
not to apply to crimes committed by one Indian against
another.
By act of June 30, 1834, a superintendent
of Indian affairs for the Indian country west of the
Mississippi was created with residence at St. Louis.
President Jackson and his associates
of the time were clearly sincere in their belief that
the Indian country, as formed by the act of 1834,
was forever dedicated to the home and uses of the
Indian, and that in thus raising a barrier against
the intrusion of white settlement, they had taken
measures to guard the Indians from the evils which
had brought them to their miserable condition. The
arguments by which the president justifies his actions
are presented in his message of December, 1835, and
the message also recites something of what the government
did for the Indians in reward for the peaceable emigration.
"The plan of removing the aboriginal
people who yet remained within the settled portion
of the United States, to the country west of the Mississippi
river, approaches its consummation. It was adopted
on the most mature consideration of the condition
of this race, and ought to be persisted in till the
object is accomplished, and prosecuted with as much
vigor as a just regard to their circumstances will
permit, and as fast as their consent can be obtained.
All preceding experiments for the improvement of the
Indians have failed. It seems now to be an established
fact, that they cannot live in contact with a civilized
community and prosper. Ages of fruitless endeavors
have, at length, brought us to a knowledge of this
principle of intercommunication with them. The past
we cannot recall, but the future we can provide for.
Independently of the treaty stipulations into which
we have entered with the various tribes for the usufructuary
rights they have ceded to us, no one can doubt the
moral duty of the government of the United States
to protect, and, if possible, to preserve and perpetuate
the scattered remnants of this race, which are left
within our borders. In the discharge of this duty,
an extensive region in the west has been assigned
for their permanent residence. It has been divided
into districts, and allotted among them. Many have
already removed, and others are preparing to go; and
with the exception of two small bands, living in Ohio
and Indiana, not exceeding fifteen hundred persons,
and of the Cherokees, all the tribes on the east side
of the Mississippi, and extending from Lake Michigan
to Florida, have entered into engagements which will
lead to their transplantation.
"The plan for their removal and
re-establishment is founded upon the knowledge we
have gained of their character and habits, and has
been dictated by a spirit of enlarged liberality.
A territory exceeding in extent that relinquished,
has been granted each tribe. Of its climate, fertility
and capacity to support an Indian population, the
representations are highly favorable. To these districts
the Indians are removed at the expense of the United
States; and, with certain supplies of clothing, arms,
ammunition, and other indispensable articles, they
are also furnished gratuitously
|

78
with provisions for the period of a
year after their arrival at their new homes.
"In that time, from the nature of
the country, and of the products raised by them, they
can subsist themselves by agricultural labor, if they
choose to resort to that mode of life; if they do
not, they are upon the skirts of the great prairies,
where countless herds of buffalo roam, and a short
time suffices to adapt their own habits to the changes
which a change of the animals, destined for their
food, may require. Ample arrangements have also been
made for the support of schools; in some instances
council houses and churches are to be erected, dwellings
constructed for the chiefs, and mills for common use.
Funds have been set apart for the maintenance of the
poor, the most necessary mechanical arts have been
introduced, and blacksmiths, gunsmiths, wheelrights,
millwrights, &c., are supported among them. Steel
and iron, and sometimes salt, are purchased for them;
and ploughs, and other farming utensils, domestic
animals, looms, spinning wheels, cards, &c., are
presented to them. And besides these beneficial arrangements,
annuities are, n all case, paid, amounting, in some
instances, to more than thirty dollars for each individual
of the tribe; and in all cases sufficiently great,
if justly divided and prudently expended, to enable
them, in addition to their own exertions, to live
comfortably. And, as a stimulus for exertion, it is
now provided by law that "in all cases of the
appointment of interpreters, or other persons employed
for the benefit of the Indians, a preference shall
be given to persons of Indian descent, if such can
be found who are properly qualified for the discharge
of the duties.
"Such are the arrangements for the
physical comfort, and for the moral improvement, of
the Indians. The necessary measures for their political
advancement, and for their separation from our citizens,
have not been neglected. The pledge of the United
States has been given by Congress, that the country
destined for the residence of this people, shall be
forever "secured and guaranteed to them.' A country,
west of Missouri and Arkansas, has been assigned them,
into which the white settlement are not to be pushed.
No political communities can be formed in that extensive
region, except those which are established by the
Indians themselves, or by the United States for them,
and with their concurrence. A barrier has thus been
raised, for their protection against the encroachments
of our citizens, and guarding the Indians, as far
as possible, from those evils which have brought them
to their present condition. Summary authority has
been given by law, to destroy all ardent spirits found
in their country, without waiting the doubtful result
and slow process of a legal seizure. I consider the
absolute and unconditional interdiction of this article,
among these people, as the first and great step in
their amelioration. Half-way measures will answer
no purpose. These cannot successfully contend against
the cupidity of the seller, and the overpowering appetite
of the buyer. And the destructive effects of the traffic
are marked in every page of the history of our Indian
intercourse."
It remains to consider some features
of the progress of the Indian tribes during the period
from the passage of the intercourse law and the removal
of the tribes west of the Mississippi. The history
of the removal and many events connected with the
establishment of the tribes here has been told in
the previous chapter. From contemporary documents,
especially the reports of the commissioners of Indian
affairs, during the years preceding the Civil war,
much
|

79
information can be found that affords
an understanding of the economic conditions of the
Indians during this period. Though a refuge of barbarism,
there were many redeeming features to the Indian country;
many evidences of improvement in habits of living,
of real progress in industry, especially in the cultivation
of fields; education was as carefully provided by
the Indian governments as by white communities, and
it is really amazing to note how some of the tribes,
notably the Choctaws, appropriated money for educational
purposes; religion was also not neglected, and in
matters of civil government the Indian councils and
legislatures were models of parliamentary procedure,
and the questions of concern were debated with a gravity
and intelligence that were not often surpassed. So
far as the judgment of history can ascertain, the
progress of civilization among the five tribes during
the decades before the Civil war was such as to justify
the plans and efforts of the founders of this asylum
for the tribes, and had untoward events and circumstances
not intervened, the outcome might have been an Indian
state in the true sense of the phrase.
When Catlin was among the Creeks
in 1834, he found them, though but recently removed
from their old homes, engaged in laying out farms
and building good houses, which were, in many instances,
surrounded by immense fields of corn and wheat. It
was a common thing, he said, to see a Creek with twenty
or thirty slaves at work on his plantation, having
brought them from a slave-holding country.
Catlin drew the portraits of two
distinguished chiefs of Indian Territory, the founders
of a family that have always been active in the nation
and leaders in many ways. They were Ben and
Sam Perryman. Says Catlin: "These
two men are brothers, and are fair specimens of the
tribe, who are mostly clad in calicoes, and other
cloths of civilized manufacture; tasselled [tasseled]
and fringed off by themselves in the most fantastic
way, and sometimes with much true and picturesque
tastes."
The Cherokees, in both the eastern and
western divisions of the tribe, were very far advanced
in the arts, according to the testimony of Catlin,
who visited and studied the tribe at Fort Gibson,
in 1834.2 Their numbers he estimated to
be about 22,000, 16,000 of whom were at that time
living in Georgia under the government of their chief,
John Ross. Catlin portrays Ross
as a "civilized and highly educated gentleman."
" And notwithstanding the bitter invective and
animadversions that have been by his political enemies
heaped upon him, I feel authorized, and bound, to
testify to the unassuming and gentlemanly urbanity
of his manner, as well as the rigid temperance of
his habits, and the purity of his language, in which
I never knew him to transgress for a moment, in public
or private interviews." Catlin likewise
expresses admiration for the aged and dignified chief,
Jol-lee, who had led the first emigration of
Cherokees, to the number of six or seven thousand,
to the lands of Arkansas. "This man [Jol-lee]
like most of the chiefs, as well as a very great proportion
of the Cherokee population, has a mixture of red and
white blood in his veins, of which, in this instance,
the first seems decidedly predominate." Catlin
wonders about the final results of the policy of transferring
these "civilized" tribes from their ancient
seats and placing them "in a new, though vast
and fertile country, 1,000 miles from the land of
their birth, in the doubtful dilemma whether to break
the natural turf with their rusting plough-shares,
or string their bows and dash over the boundless prairies,
beckoned on by the
|

80
alluring dictates of their nature, seeking
laurel amongst the ranks of their new enemies, and
subsistence among the herds of buffaloes."
In 1834 there lived on the banks of the
Canadian a hundred miles or so southwest of Fort Gibson,
a band of several hundred Cherokees under the government
of a distinguished chief named Tuch-ee, whom
the white people familiarly called "Dutch."
This chief accompanied the Dodge expedition to southwest
Indian Territory in 1834, as hunter and guide, and
thus became well known to George Catlin, who
described him as "one of the most extraordinary
men that lives on the frontiers at the present day,
both for his remarkable history, and for his fine
and manly figure, and character of face."
The account of this chief and his followers,
as given by Catlin, is one of the important
phases of the removal of the Cherokees beyond the
Mississippi. It is as follows: "Some twenty years
or more since, becoming fatigued and incensed with
civilized encroachments, that were continually making
on the borders of the Cherokee country in Georgia,
where he then resided, and probably foreseeing the
disastrous results they were to lead to, he beat up
for volunteers to emigrate to the west, where he had
designed to go, and colonize in a wild country beyond
the reach and contamination of civilized innovation;
and succeeded in getting several hundred men, women
and children, whom he led over the banks of the Mississippi,
and settled upon the head waters of White river, where
they lived until the appearance of white faces, which
began to peep through the forest at them, when they
made another move of 600 miles to the banks of the
Canadian, where they now reside; and where by the
system of desperate warfare which he has carried on
against the Osage and Commanches, he has successfully
cleared away from a large tract of fine country all
the enemies that could contend for it, and now holds
it, with his little band of myrmidons, as their own
undisputed soil, where the are living comfortably
by raising from the soil fine crops of corn and potatoes,
and other necessities of life; whilst they indulge
whenever they please in the pleasures of the chase
amongst the herds of buffaloes, or in the natural
propensity for ornamenting their dresses and their
war-clubs with the scalp-locks of their enemies."
The condition of the most important Indian
tribes inhabiting the Indian country in 1839 is described
by McCoy in his "Baptist Indian Missions."
Beginning with the Osages, whose reservation began
twenty-five miles west of Missouri, he says: "They
number 5,510 souls. . . . . No tribe has been so much
neglected by the government of the United States,
so much imposed upon by rapacious traders, or so grossly
traduced by both white and red men, as this wretched
people, who have been incapable of pleading their
own cause, or of telling their own story of sufferings.
During the last eleven years they have presented an
inviting field for missionary effort, which might
be entered with the prospect of imparting much benefit.
Government has at different times made liberal provisions
for the assistance of these people in improving their
condition, but hitherto, for want of regard for their
interests on the part of those who have mingled with
them for the purpose of applying the means of relief,
no benefit of consequence has been afforded them.
The Baptists have made an effort to establish a mission
among them, and are hindered only by a want of missionaries.
[Footnote]
2Catlin,
"Letters and Notes," Vol. II, p. 119
|

81
The Presbyterians had missions among
them, but they have been abandoned."
"The Creeks and Seminoles have become
blended; their whole number is computed to be 24,100.
. . . Many of these may properly be denominated civilized,
though a majority fall below that appellation. They
have not yet recovered from the damage sustained by
emigration; nevertheless, their prospects of becoming
comfortable, and of improving in industry and virtue,
are very good. Considered as a tribe, they are in
these respects a little in the rear of the Cherokees
and Choctaws. . . . The Presbyterians and Methodists
have had missions among them, but have relinquished
them." The Baptist mission among the Creeks was
started with every prospect of success, but was broken
up either, as was alleged, by the undue zeal on the
part of the missionaries in preaching anti-slavery
doctrines, or by a less reasonable hostility against
the mission influence, fostered largely, it was thought,
by selfish whites.
"The Cherokee country," continues
Rev. McCoy, "adjoins the state of Arkansas on
the north of the river of the same name. About six
thousand have been several years resident in that
country, and, by late emigrations, their number has
increased to about twenty-two thousand. These may
be denominated a civilized people, though less civilized,
taken as a whole, than an equal number of white citizens
on the frontiers of our new states. At the same time,
there are many who are wealthy, and not a few who
have attained a state of refinement in manners which
would render them respectable anywhere in the United
States. They have some men of respectable education,
and a still great number of men whose talents would
not suffer by comparison with talented men of our
nation. . . . The Presbyterians have long had several
missionary stations in this country, the most extended
and useful of which is Dwight, the minister at which
is Rev. C. Washburn. . . . The Dwight station
has always sustained a large boarding school, which
has given to it stability of character, and opened
the way to every part of the nation for imparting
religious instruction, by preaching and otherwise,
to the extent of the whole time of the missionaries.
They have a printing press in operation at one of
their stations. The Methodists also have missions
among these people." The Baptists had placed
a mission among the Cherokees in 1817, before the
removal, and at that time the two most noted missionaries
among them were Evan Jones and Jesse Bushyhead,
each of whom had conducted a party of Cherokees to
their new homes. Rev. Bushyhead was a native
Cherokee. The names of these missionaries were subsequently
identified with many important events in the Cherokee
Nation.
"The Choctaws are estimated at fifteen
thousand, and are the most southern tribe. . . . The
Chickasaw tribe, numbering 5,500, is merged with the
Choctaw, making the whole number, 20,500. These are
justly entitled to the appellation of a civilized
tribe. Before the late difficulties, the Cherokee
Nation was allowed to be in advance of all others.
But the Choctaws, having had time, since their settlement
in their permanent home, to organize their civil government
judiciously, must be said to be at this time in advance
of every other tribe. We say more: No Indian tribe,
since the discovery of America by white men, except
the Choctaw, has fully exchanged the savage customs
for the institutions of civil government. Their existence
as a civilized community is in its incipient stages.
Nevertheless, the foundation appears to be permanently
laid, for the promotion
|

82
of civilization, to the entire exclusion
of the customs peculiar to savage life in the management
of public affairs."
In the report of the commissioner of
Indian affairs for 1838, are some interesting facts
concerning the industrial and civil advancements of
the Choctaws and Chickasaws. The former were already
engaged in the cultivation of cotton along the Red
river, and from another source it is learned that
they manufactured cloth at that time. Three gins were
owned and operated by natives. Col. David Folsom,
"an intelligent and wealthy Choctaw," was
manufacturing the much needed article of salt on Boggy
near Blue. The Choctaw council house had just been
completed and was first used for the assembling of
the representative council in October, 1838.
"The Chickasaws," to quote
the report, "have settled generally through the
Choctaw Nation, without going to the district assigned
them by the treaty. They have, however, a right to
settle in any part of the Choctaw Nation, and enjoy
equal privileges, one with another, except in the
national fund. Generally speaking, they have settled
in companies or bodies over the nation. . . . The
largest body of Chickasaws have settled on Boggy and
Blue. . . . The Choctaws have changed their constitution
and admitted the Chickasaws into their council, with
a chief and ten councilors, the same as either of
the other Choctaw districts. Speaking, as they do,
the same language, and intermarrying with each other,
there cannot be doubt but in a few years they will
be one people. A few of the wealthier half-breeds
have settled near Fort Towson, with the design of
raising cotton largely. Colonel Colbert has
a farm opened, and will cultivate next year from 300
to 500 acres in cotton, besides making corn sufficient
for his hands. Upon this farm he has 150 slaves.
"The Creeks," states the Indian
commissioner in 1838, "settled quite thick together
when they first reached the country; they are now
extending their settlements up the Canadian to Little
river, and a few have even gone further out towards
Camp Mason. This will enable them to raise stock and
be more comfortably situated. Another portion of the
late emigrant Creeks have gone up the Arkansas and
have joined what is called the McIntosh part.
The nation is divided into what is called upper and
lower towns, as it was before their removal. McIntosh
is chief of the lower town, and Apthleyohola
of the upper town. The parties are nearly equally
divided."
The difficulties arising from the settlement
of the Seminoles among the Creeks and Cherokees on
their removal to the Indian country continued for
several years to perplex the Indian officials, until
the question was settled in the treaty negotiated
in January, 1845, with the Creeks and Seminoles. Large
numbers of the Seminoles, chiefly the more hostile
of the recent emigrants, had without authority settled
among the Cherokees, to whom they were exceedingly
troublesome on account of their marauding habits,
and destitute condition. The country provided for
some years before had been appropriated to the upper
Creeks at a time when it was considered important
to separate that band from their former antagonists
of the lower towns. This disposition to their lands
caused the Seminoles to refuse to settle in any part
of the Creek country, and they were a troublesome
factor in Indian affairs until the treaty of 1845,
when the differences were reconciled by securing to
the Seminoles a full
|

83
representation in the Creek government,
giving them the right to settle without restriction
on vacant Creek lands, and furnishing them six months'
subsistence (the last provision being, in the opinion
of the agent, the chief incentive to their assent
to the treaty). The great body of this tribe, in consequence,
had moved to the vicinity of Little river, and were
reported, in September, 1845, as prospering.
The report of the superintendent of the
southern superintendency in September, 1859, deals
specifically with several questions that are of particular
interest in understanding the condition of the tribes
just before the war. The strong bias that crossed
all the judgments of men on public matters and policies
at that time makes it necessary to qualify even these
expressions on the Indian tribes. Of civilization
among the Cherokees, his opinion is that "so
far as concern their moral and intellectual development,
at best, they do no more at present than not to retrograde.
. . While they continue obstinately wedded to their
notions of nationality and of holding their lands
in common, and inveterately opposed to opening their
country to settlement, and to taking any steps toward
admission into the union of states, they cannot be
expected to advance in civilization beyond a certain
point, which, I think, they have already reached."
Then follows an exposition of one of
the causes that had been working for years toward
the disintegration of the Indian tribes. "The
abandonment of the military post at Fort Gibson and
the growing up of a vicious little town there have
given unusual activity to the whiskey trade in that
region of the Cherokee country, and in the Creek country
adjoining. During the last Creek payment several hundred
gallons of liquor were vended in small quantities
and at enormous prices, just within the Cherokee lines,
and disorder and violence were the natural consequence."
The evils growing out of large annuity payments to
the Indians are also critised. "The Creeks have
received the last large sums of money payable to them
by the United States under the treaty of 1856. . .
. With the cessation of these payments many of the
traders will disappear from the country, and the business
of those that remain will no longer consist in purchasing
head rights in advance, but the Indians will be compelled
to resort to the raising of stock and grain as a means
for the purchase of goods no longer sold on credit.
It is to be hoped that then the number of officials
will be diminished, so that some portion of the Creek
annuities may be devoted to other purposes than the
payment of salaries; since public buildings are needed,
and there are roads that should be improved, and bridges
that should be erected, for which, and for other national
purposes, nothing is ever to be found in the treasury.
. . ."
This report estimates the whole number
of Cherokee Indians to be 21,000, with 4,000 voters.
It has been said that the Cherokees had little interest
in slave-holding. Yet the number of negroes in the
nation at that time was estimated at 4,000 (see below),
which would indicate that no small part of the labor
was performed by slaves, and that slavery was an institution
among the Cherokees of no small financial and industrial
extent. The insinuating progress of white intrusion
is also seen in the presence among the Cherokees at
that time of 1,000 persons.
The report of the eighth census (1860)
contains a valuable summary of the status of slavery
among the five tribes. With a total of nearly 8,000
slaves among the Indians of these tribes, and the
two tribes
|

84
most advanced in civilization possessing
two-thirds of the whole number, it is evident that
slavery was a recognized institution of the Indian
country and an integral part of the industrial system,
though not so vitally a factor of material prosperity
here as in the southern states. The portion of the
census report referred to is quoted:
"A new element has been developed
by the present census, viz., that of the statistics
of negro slavery among the Indian tribes west of Arkansas
comprising the Choctaw, Cherokee, Creek and Chickasaw
nations; also the number of white and free colored
population scattered throughout these tribes. . .
. By references to this table it will appear that
the Choctaws held 2,297 negro slaves, distributed
among 385 owners; the Cherokees, 2,504, held by 384
owners, the Creeks, 1,651, owned by 267 Indians; and
the Chickasaws, 917, to 118 owners. As, under all
the circumstances of slavery everywhere, the servile
race is very unequally distributed, so will appear
to be the case with the Indian tribes. While one Choctaw
is the owner of 227 slaves, and ten of the largest
proprietors own 638, averaging nearly 64, the slaves
average about 6 to each owner of slaves in that tribe,
while the Indians number about as 8 to 1 slave.
"Among the Cherokees the largest
proprietor holds 57 slaves; the ten largest own 353,
averaging a little over 25, and the number to each
holder averages a little more than a half per cent
more than with the Choctaws, while the population
of Indians in the tribe to slaves is about 9 to 1.
Among the Creeks 2 hold 75 slaves each; 10 own 433,
while the ration of slaves to the whole number of
Indians varies but little from that with the Cherokees.
The largest proprietor among the Chickasaws holds
61 slaves; ten own 275, or an average of 27 1/2, while
the average is nearly 8 to each owner in the tribe,
and 1 to each 5 1/2 Indians in the tribe. It thus
appears that in those tribes there are nearly 8 Indians
to each Negro slave, and that the slaves form about
12 1/2 per cent of the population, omitting the whites
and free colored. The small tribe of Seminoles, although
like the tribes above mentioned, transplanted from
slave-holding states, holds no slaves, but the intermarry
with the colored population. These tribes, while they
present an advanced state of civilization, and some
of them have attained to a condition of comforth,
wealth, and refinement, form but a small portion of
the Indian tribes within the territory of the United
States, and are alluded to on account of their relation
to a civil condition recognized by a portion of the
States, and which exercise a significant influence
with the country at large."
|
|


|
|