County seat location fights 'dandies'
![]() |
| Political fights over location of courthouses took place in seven area counties. Five communities sought the Trempealeau County Courthouse before it wound up in Whitehall. Construction of these buildings in 1882 ended the battle. Whitehall is the most central of the communities involved. |
Back
before the turn of the century, residents of most counties realized the value of
having the county seat located in their communities.
Some
of the biggest political battles were waged over which community would be the
seat of government.
In most cases, the
communities which won became the largest while some of the other fledgling towns
faded from the picture.
Seven battles around area
County
seat fights occurred in Barron, Clark, Dunn, Pierce, Pepin, Buffalo and
Trempealeau counties.
There was little
discussion about where the county seats would be in Chippewa, Eau Claire,
Jackson, Rusk, St. Croix or Taylor counties because there were larger
communities already established.
Pierce County action
When
the legislature set off new counties, it noted that no county seats could be
moved until the majority of the voters favored its removal.
The question of voting for the site was the
big fight in Pierce County. The county had been set aside form St. Croix County
in 1853 but the bitter fight over the county seat did not heat up until the
period from 1859-61.
Much of that was carried
on in the county's three newspapers, the "Prescott Transcript" and "Northwestern
Democrat" and the "River Falls Journal".
The
"River Falls Journal" pointed out that the law said the county seat
should be at the geographical center of the county for the convenience of the
people.
Papers in Prescott, where the county
seat was, said that argument was weak and the county seat should be at the
center of business activity, and that was Prescott.
There
were several efforts to get the issue before the voters. But it took two years,
until the April 2 election of 1861, before the county voters approved a measure
for removal. The only votes against removal from Prescott were from that
community and two neighboring towns.
It was decided to build the county seat in
Perry Township at the center of the county. There was no community there at the
time - it later became Ellsworth - but the county board could not get together
on funds for the project. Board members apparently supported removal from
Prescott but were unwilling to pay the cost.
In
the meantime, residents of Prescott made one more attempt to regain the county
seat by offering free use of buildings for three years. River Falls interests
said they'd do the same thing.
Finally the
board agreed it had to settle the issue and designated $2,000 for a building at
Perry. This was inadequate and later $6,000 more was authorized. By the end of
1861 the county seat was established in the Town of Perry, although the township
had cast only 31 votes to have the seat located there.
When
Dunn County was formed in 1854 out of Chippewa County, it contained all the land
now in Dunn County and that which is now Pepin County. Dunnville was selected
because of its central location.
In 1858 the
courthouse burned and the records were destroyed. About the same time Pepin
County was formed.
Because of power and
influence being controlled by Menomonie-based interest, Dunnville lost the
county seat to Menomonie.
Dunnville was then
known only as a steamboat landing. After the arrival of the railroad, the town
continued its demise, having only 100 persons in 1888. It has faded away since.
Neillsville won
Clark
county is another example of where the community that gained the county seat
grew while the loser never flourished.
Clark
County was set off from Jackson County in 1853, its entire area being included
in a single town, Pine Valley, named because of the growth of pine on the upper
Black River.
James O'Neill, for whom
Neillsville is named, was the first board chairman.
In
the same year, Samuel Weston, Dave Robinson, and other men, all from Maine,
settled on Black River two miles north of Neillsville and started the village of
Weston.
The Weston backers and those of
Neillsville battled over the county seat and Neillsville influence won out.
Weston is no longer on the map while Neillsville has become the principle city
of the area.
North Pepin early seat
![]() |
| Durand won the right to have the Pepin County Courthouse located there but Pepin and Arkansaw were also in the running. The county seat started at Pepin, then went to Durand, to Arkansaw, and finally back to Durand where this building was constructed. |
After
Pepin was set off from Dunn County, North Pepin was picked for the county seat.
In 1859 a vote was taken to move the seat to Durand. It failed by three votes,
351-348.
Two years later in November, a second
vote was taken with 429 approving removal to Durand and 327 opposing. In 1867
the state court upheld the vote following an appeal by Pepin.
In
1871 Arkansaw got into the act and it was voted 697-648 to move the seat to that
community. The following year another vote was taken and Arkansaw won again.
In
1886, by 937 to 618, Pepin voters sent the county seat back to Durand where it
remained.
Alma won in election
The
battle for the county seat in Buffalo County was mostly between Fountain City
and Alma, although Buffalo City made a bid for it.
When the county was formed in 1860, Fountain
City interest prevailed because of the influence of local politicians. later in
1860 the legislature decided the site should be determined by election.
Alma won but the screening committee tossed
out a number of votes because of "irregularities" and "informalities"
and the county seat remained at Fountain City.
The
state court in May of the same year examined the questioned votes and decided
the courthouse should go to Alma. The following year before any construction
had started, Buffalo City individuals offered a free courthouse and jail
buildings. Another vote was held and Alma interest carried the day. it was
again contested by Fountain City but in the end Alma won.
Recent controversy
Buffalo
county experienced the wrenching strain of protracted efforts to move the
courthouse from Alma to Mondovi as recently as the early 1960s.
Sparked
by plans to construct a new courthouse in Alma in 1959, Mondovi backers sought
first by county board resolution and then by petition to secure a county-wide
referendum on the proposal.
The board rejected
18 to 10 Mondovi Supervisor Lorn Howard's request for a referendum of voter
attitude toward building in Alma. The vote was 19 to 9 in favor of building in
Alma the next day after Alma Mayor Ed Hitt offered money and land for the
project.
But Mondovi supporters came back in
May 1961 with 269 petitions with 2,497 signers asking the county seat be moved
to Mondovi. Supervisor Otto Bollinger, Mondovi, presented them with a
resolution seeking a referendum. The effort lost 20 to 8.
As the issue moved into circuit court, the
board once more considered the petitions and rejected them on grounds they did
not contain enough names. The judge ordered the county to search its records.
Although
the committee found the petitions lacked the required number of names, Judge
Robert Varnum ruled the county must accept the petitions as qualified but that a
referendum was unnecessary because Alma Courthouse plans had progressed too far.
At
its May 1961 meeting, the board voted 28-0 for the #350,000 bond issue, and the
new courthouse was built alongside the old one at Alma.
Four in Trempealeau
Four
Trempealeau communities were involved in a county seat fight. When the county
was first formed Judge Georgerge Gale, for whom Galesville is named, was a
strong political force and the county seat was at Galesville.
After
his death a seven-year fight occurred with the county seat finally ending up at
Whitehall.
Those supporting Arcadia won the
right to have the county seat in 1876 against the opposition from Whitehall.
The following year a committee voted for removal to Whitehall and then, on a
county-wide election, the voters favored Whitehall by 1600 votes.
Blair
then made its move but petitions were turned down in early 1878 by 420 votes.
Later that same year, voters rejected Blair again.
There
were three other attempts for removal from Whitehall, but the supporters of the
more central location managed to keep it there.
The
entire issue was resolved in 1882, seven years after the first battling when
construction was started on the he courthouse and jail at Whitehall.
Long debate in Barron
Barron
won a 21-year debate to gain the site for the Barron County courthouse despite
fighting the odds of the larger community of Rice Lake Mills and the power of
the Knapp, Stout & Co., Company.
Barron
County was part of Polk County when it was set aside in 1862 under the name
Dalles County, and became Barron County in 1869. It took until 1874 to set its
official boundaries.
The new board met for the
first time in the home of John Banks near the present village of Prairie Farm.
It met at various places including logging camps and houses around Barron for
several years.
On Oct. 2, 1837, 97 petitioned for a vote on
moving the county seat to Rice Lake. A Nov. 4, 1873 vote favored the removal to
Rice Lake 269 to 174. The following January the board met in a rented room from
the Knapp, Stout & Co., Company.
John Quaderer, although an employee of the
lumber firm, had favored the Barron location. In November 1874 voters approved
the moving of the county seat back to Barron. Dec. 29 of that year the governor
proclaimed the election valid and ordered the seat removed to Barron.
W. S. Grover, the clerk, quickly bundled up
county records and moved them to Barron. County Treasurer Henry Sawyer, amid
rumors that Knapp-Stout would seek an injunction, refused to move. His office
the following spring was declared vacant.
Rice
Lake's efforts had not ended. in 1887 the community was granted a city charter,
but Barron, seeing this as another attempt to gain the county seat, also applied
and was granted a charter as a city.
In 1890 the county board voted 13 to 12
against a resolution calling for removal to Rice Lake. Interests supporting
Rice Lake made one more bid the following year when they managed to obtain
enough names on a petition to call for another vote on where the county seat
should be.
Again Barron supporters went to work and
managed to have 196 persons withdraw their names from the petition. The state
Supreme Court ruled that there was not the necessary two-fifths of the poll of
voters on the petition and declared that no election could, therefore, be held.
Throughout
the years there has been talk of moving the county seat from Barron to Rice Lake
but the former interest always has prevailed.
-- Arnie Hoffman
Extracted from the Eau
Claire Leader Telegram
Special Publication, Our Story 'The Chippewa
Valley and Beyond', published 1976
Used with permission.


